From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 20 04:14:49 2012
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 475FD1065670; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 04:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 04:14:49 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20120220041449.GA65665@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201202182356.q1INuU7V061378@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20120219060053.GA45762@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120219150943.GA6673@magic.hamla.org>
	<20120219164528.GA48166@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120219175645.GA6833@magic.hamla.org>
	<20120219191106.GA71541@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120219203937.GA6943@magic.hamla.org>
	<20120220012336.GA41983@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120220024754.GB7587@magic.hamla.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120220024754.GB7587@magic.hamla.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/adime Makefile ports/x11-wm/icewm
	Makefile ports/graphics/scr2png Makefile ports/x11/xbindkeys
	Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 04:14:49 -0000

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:47:54PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 01:23:36 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > "Wine argument" does not sound too technical to me.
> 
> I have no clue what that means, but at this juncture it is irrelevant.

Mikhail made a reference to buying a bottle of dry red wine in a store in
the original email which you've sent me the link to.  Not sure why you
didn't notice it. :-)

> > Thus, it's safer to always specify it.  At least it allows to catch
> > versions inconsistencies earlier.
> 
> No, it is not always safer to specify it; and by the time I saw your
> latest contribution to this thread, I see that dougb@ has done a
> splendid job of trying to explain the opposing viewpoint to you rather
> clearly.

Yes, he did (as always).

> I trust that has satiated your desire for people to repeat the
> technical components of discussion that had already been archived on
> freebsd-ports.

Right, sorry I didn't catch the point originally from mi@.  I was viewing
the issue from a limited angle.  Doug pointed out exact deficiency in my
thinking and provided real scenario when it can be a bummer (that is, if
one wants to hold shlib dependency while being able to chase updates of
the leaf ports).  Previously I did not consider that dependency might be
held for some reason.

./danfe