From owner-freebsd-net  Wed Feb  7 17:14:13 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9ED237B65D
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Feb 2001 17:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id KAA09386;
	Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:13:40 +0900 (JST)
To: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>
Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, net@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: jlemon's message of Wed, 07 Feb 2001 14:28:47 CST.
      <200102072028.f17KSlL77553@prism.flugsvamp.com>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: [itojun@iijlab.net: accept(2) behavior with tcp RST right after handshake]
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 10:13:40 +0900
Message-ID: <9384.981594820@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>Looks good to me (although the patch is mixed in with a bunch
>of other crud).  I've tested it out locally and will commit it
>unless there are any objections.

	it is because of cvs issue.  the important portion is below.

itojun



@@ -320,11 +359,8 @@ soaccept(so, nam)
        so->so_state &= ~SS_NOFDREF;
        if ((so->so_state & SS_ISDISCONNECTED) == 0)
                error = (*so->so_proto->pr_usrreqs->pru_accept)(so, nam);
-       else {
-               if (nam)
-                       *nam = 0;
-               error = 0;
-       }
+       else
+               error = ECONNABORTED;
        splx(s);
        return (error);
 }


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message