From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Sat Jun 11 21:51:24 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7888BAF043F
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 11 Jun 2016 21:51:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69327283A
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 21:51:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u5BLpNVd076235
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 21:51:24 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 74654] libsupc++.a lacks necessary functions
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 21:51:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: gnu
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: markmi@dsl-only.net
X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Overcome By Events
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-74654-8-ZfF3JKdaaH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-74654-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-74654-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 21:51:24 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D74654

Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |markmi@dsl-only.net

--- Comment #4 from Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> ---
(In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #3)

TARGET_ARCH=3Dpowerpc and TARGET_ARCH=3Dpowerpc64 of tier 2 are are still g=
cc 4.2.1
and libstdc++ based as far as built-in system compilers go.

Are they now libcxxrt based: Is libstdc++ now working on top of libcxxrt
instead of on libsupc++ ? (Clang is not sufficient yet for powerpc64 or
powerpc.)

powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc and its powerpc64-gcc might be considered as cover=
ing
powerpc64, allowing libc++ (and libcxxrt). Are they considered as covering =
the
issue for powerpc64?

But there is no equivalent for powerpc (non-64).

[I do not claim to know much about the status for the likes of mips and spa=
rc
but might some of them also have such issues?]

Should this report be left open but only for some tier 2 architectures?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=