Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:08:16 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>, Michal Mertl <mime@traveller.cz>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When to use atomic_ functions? (was: 64 bit counters) Message-ID: <3C34C840.6754F85A@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201031110260.24204-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > It's interresti gthat the major antagonists here are all withon 70 km > (Terry are you still in Foster City?) Yes... Of course, we are all *pro*tagonists, not *an*tagonists... > why not just get together with a whiteboard somewhere (here?) > and hack out the locking strategies over a few cups of coffee? Like the whole threads thing? I'm hesitant, since so many good ideas come from outside the circle you describe; we really need better virtual presence capability. I count 4 people on the "Cc:" of your (and this) email who would not be able to attend in person, unless they are on holiday in the U.S. right now... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C34C840.6754F85A>