From owner-freebsd-hubs Sat Mar 23 02:20:45 1996 Return-Path: owner-hubs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA13673 for hubs-outgoing; Sat, 23 Mar 1996 02:20:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA13637 Sat, 23 Mar 1996 02:20:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0u0QQx-0003wNC; Sat, 23 Mar 96 02:20 PST Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA07430; Sat, 23 Mar 1996 08:00:37 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: Peter Wemm cc: John Polstra , jkh@time.cdrom.com, freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new sup server In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 23 Mar 1996 07:43:55 +0800." <199603222343.HAA07395@jhome.DIALix.COM> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 08:00:37 +0000 Message-ID: <7428.827568037@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Am I the only one that thinks that using sup to feed the sup mirrors is > *extemely* prone to error? no. > CTM would be *far* better to feed the mirrors with, if only it preserved the > timestamps of the files. (phk: hint hint! :-) Well, >anybody< could implement that, hint hint! :-) > I initially got my source via sup, but after several sup botches (way back at > about the 2.0.5 era), I tried CTM. and have *never* had the slightest hiccup > in about a thousand deltas. :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.