From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jun 26 1:15:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from hcsext.hcs.de (hcshh.hcs.de [194.123.40.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA7461524D for ; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 01:15:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hm@hcs.de) Received: from hcswork.hcs.de([192.76.124.5]) (1474 bytes) by hcsext.hcs.de via sendmail with P:smtp/R:inet_hosts/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:14:32 +0200 (CEST) (Smail-3.2.0.104 1998-Nov-20 #1 built 1998-Dec-11) Received: by hcswork.hcs.de (Smail3.1.29.0 #12) id m10xnbX-0000fgC; Sat, 26 Jun 99 10:14 METDST Message-Id: From: hm@hcs.de (Hellmuth Michaelis) Subject: Re: NT vs Linux benchmark saga continues (fwd) In-Reply-To: from Matthew Jacob at "Jun 25, 99 03:01:07 pm" To: mjacob@feral.com Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:14:27 +0200 (METDST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: hm@hcs.de Organization: HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 618 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG And to follow up on this topic: the german magazine c't has an article in their current issue, where they compare a real-world setup measuring web-server performance for NT an Linux both for an SMP and non-SMP setup. Linux was - depending on the setup and application - a bit to much faster ... hellmuth -- Hellmuth Michaelis Tel +49 40 559747-70 HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH Fax +49 40 559747-77 Oldesloer Strasse 97-99 Mail hm [at] hcs.de 22457 Hamburg WWW http://www.hcs.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message