Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:42:17 +0200
From:      Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup <seb@struchtrup.com>
Subject:   Re: alternative options for ports
Message-ID:  <200410122242.33167.4711@chello.at>
In-Reply-To: <416C35A5.4040703@vonostingroup.com>
References:  <416C0DE8.3000004@struchtrup.com> <416C35A5.4040703@vonostingroup.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 12 October 2004 21:51, Frank Laszlo wrote:
> I personally do not like dialog's in ports, period. It makes unattended
> builds a pain, mostly when compiling large ports with an extensive list
> of depends, you never know which dependency is going to pop up a dialog
> in the middle of an all-night build. 

A target 'config-recursive' would be a nice idea.

- -- 
Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x3BCA53BE 
OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBbEG509WjGjvKU74RAhreAJ9Um8ZEww39jlF3g7LOWvtql5T5OACfXXY+
Is2tpvUQGjXH3EuoCy9O8cU=
=Iy8k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410122242.33167.4711>