Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:02:53 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/30873: ``ip'' man page does not specify byte order for ip header with raw sockets Message-ID: <20050222140253.GH805@straylight.m.ringlet.net> In-Reply-To: <20050222135313.GA81336@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <200502221333.j1MDXo0t086246@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050222134026.GE805@straylight.m.ringlet.net> <20050222135313.GA81336@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--h3LYUU6HlUDSAOzy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:53:13PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-02-22 15:40, Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:33:50PM +0000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> Synopsis: ``ip'' man page does not specify byte order for ip header wi= th raw sockets > >> > >> State-Changed-From-To: patched->closed > >> State-Changed-By: keramida > >> State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 22 13:32:59 GMT 2005 > >> State-Changed-Why: > >> The RELENG_5 branch was created after this change was committed to HEA= D. > >> This means that the change is already in 5-STABLE, so there is no need > >> to keep this PR open as "patched". > > > > What if Bruce meant to MFC it to RELENG_4, too, and then plain > > forgot? This PR would (okay, should have) served as a reminder to > > that effect... Yes, I know RELENG_5 is the official stable branch, > > but is it now our official Project policy that RELENG_4 is the > > official stale branch? :) >=20 > Commits to 4.X are no longer possible, unless I have misunderstood the > messages posted by RE after the release of 4.11. It is possible that > I have misunderstood the intention of the release engineers, in which > case we should reopen the PR and let Bruce handle it. I believe you mean commits to RELENG_4_*11* are no longer possible, as it is an errata branch... I've certainly seen updates fly by on the 4.x box I'm keeping here mostly for reference porpoises. For instance, Ruslan merged a route timeout fix on Valentine's Day, and Gregory Neil Shapiro merged sendmail 8.13.3 just two days ago :) G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@cnsys.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If I had finished this sentence, --h3LYUU6HlUDSAOzy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCGzuN7Ri2jRYZRVMRAnY+AKCT7P3vC2RdNacdqc8H2OclEBRMUwCfRqps uXl5uSFX997rj6ABjeIuw0s= =CeE9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h3LYUU6HlUDSAOzy--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050222140253.GH805>