Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:43:29 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading libs with many dependent ports Message-ID: <20120118234329.GM509@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1uFbWq2foY-wp4ECeFJwLijFSso6AzNWpy-PgcwiJor_g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAN6yY1t7xAdWvGQvDQMksfSA2E6wdFryd0BUFKzNGvqUOhWZsg@mail.gmail.com> <20120118020928.GE509@over-yonder.net> <CAN6yY1uFbWq2foY-wp4ECeFJwLijFSso6AzNWpy-PgcwiJor_g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:43:27PM -0800 I heard the voice of Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus: > > Take a look at pkg_chklib. It is quite optimized and runs multiple > checks in parallel so that you can run it on 1100 ports in about 1.5 > minutes. I've looked at it. From the samples and docs I've seen, it seems to do both more and less than I want. That's not a knock on it, it just goes in a slightly different direction than I want. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120118234329.GM509>