Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:20:44 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. Message-ID: <86fy7au3r7.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200704082014.06848.max@love2party.net> (Max Laier's message of "Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:13:59 %2B0200") References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <86k5wo55s0.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200704081910.42852.max@love2party.net> <200704082014.06848.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Max Laier <max@love2party.net> writes: > The attached diff lets me survive the dump/restore. Not sure if > this is the right fix, but seems like the union messes with mutex > initialization. You need to track down where memory for the mutex (or rather zap) was actually allocated, and stick the memset there. I suspect it originates on the stack somewhere. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fy7au3r7.fsf>