From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 18:20:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5D916A405; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 18:20:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EF213C4BF; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 18:20:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2293D20A3; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:20:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C7920A2; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:20:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F07FCA10A5; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:20:44 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Max Laier References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <86k5wo55s0.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200704081910.42852.max@love2party.net> <200704082014.06848.max@love2party.net> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:20:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200704082014.06848.max@love2party.net> (Max Laier's message of "Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:13:59 +0200") Message-ID: <86fy7au3r7.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:20:49 -0000 Max Laier writes: > The attached diff lets me survive the dump/restore. Not sure if > this is the right fix, but seems like the union messes with mutex > initialization. You need to track down where memory for the mutex (or rather zap) was actually allocated, and stick the memset there. I suspect it originates on the stack somewhere. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no