From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 1 4:37: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from calis.blacksun.org (Calis.blacksun.org [168.100.186.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EFC150A8 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 04:37:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from don@calis.blacksun.org) Received: from localhost (don@localhost) by calis.blacksun.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA46412; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 07:38:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from don@calis.blacksun.org) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 07:38:42 -0500 (EST) From: Don To: Ville-Pertti Keinonen Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: journaling UFS and LFS In-Reply-To: <86hfj63es8.fsf@not.demophon.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > There is a difference between a log-structured filesystem and a > journaling filesystem... And? > *Very* different from LFS. (What are features? "Has files and > directories"? Time-complexity? Implementation details? Buzzwords?) You know. Features. As in those things that people would like to see in such a file system. The features we would like to see have already been listed. Please see the archives if you want to know what was considered a "feature". Besides, VxFS has a closer feature set to what I would like to see. > This seems a bit hard to believe (must check freebsd-fs to see if > people are actually *seriously* considering LFS as a starting > point...). Some people would prefer to start from scratch. Others have suggested LFS as a starting point. Still others no longer care. -don <--- no longer cares Please stop copying me on these messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message