From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 03:14:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B1F106566C for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 03:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD4E8FC16 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 03:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so7293799obb.13 for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:14:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com designates 10.60.4.71 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.4.71; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com designates 10.60.4.71 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kudzu@tenebras.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.4.71]) by 10.60.4.71 with SMTP id i7mr8945095oei.39.1331003657571 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:14:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.4.71 with SMTP id i7mr7858638oei.39.1331003657481; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:14:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.49.164 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:14:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F54D30D.9000203@smsdesign.org> References: <20308.52713.516369.307097@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4F54D30D.9000203@smsdesign.org> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:14:17 -0800 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: Tim Kellers X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQVU6sGA4QuXqDOYt6iIh+sf0cZfPEQG6srzHl0m+cZV8JRFRrRuhZvJ0ojrvBIzEREf/I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 03:14:18 -0000 ipsc, from packages or ports, is very useful. > ipsc -gch 10.0.0.32/27 Network class: A Network mask: 255.0.0.0 Network mask (hex): FF000000 Network address: 10.0.0.32 Subnet bits: 19 Max subnets: 524288 Full subnet mask: 255.255.255.224 Full subnet mask (hex): FFFFFFE0 Host bits: 5 Hosts per subnet: 32 Bit map: nnnnnnnn.ssssssss.ssssssss.ssshhhhh IP address: 10.0.0.32 Hexadecimal IP address: A000020 Address allocation range: 10.0.0.32 - 10.0.0.63 Full subnet mask: 255.255.255.224 Subnet mask: 0.255.255.224 Subnet ID: 0.0.0.32 Network ID: 10.0.0.0 Host ID: 0.0.0.32 Cisco Wildcard: 0.0.0.31 CIDR notation: 10.0.0.0 /27 Route/Mask: 10.0.0.0 / 255.255.255.224 Hexadecimal route/mask: A000000 / FFFFFFE0 Supernet max: 0 On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Tim Kellers wrote: > On 03/05/12 09:30, Robert Huff wrote: > >> With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: >> >> 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 >> >> is correctly described by: >> >> 10.0.0.32/27 >> >> Anyone? Please? >> >> >> Robert Huff >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org " >> > > Network = 10.0.0.32 > Usable IPs = 10.0.0.33 to 10.0.0.62 for 30 > Broadcast = 10.0.0.63 > Netmask = 255.255.255.224 > Wildcard Mask = 0.0.0.31 > > > > Looks pretty good to me. > > Tim Kellers > > > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " >