From owner-freebsd-chat  Sat Apr 19 18:33:08 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA27281
          for chat-outgoing; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 18:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.konnections.com (mail.konnections.com [192.41.71.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA27276
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 18:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from castle (root@ip204.konnections.com [192.41.71.204]) by mail.konnections.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id TAA20604; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 19:32:01 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <335AD053.5CEE766@konnections.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 19:26:27 -0700
From: mike allison <mallison@konnections.com>
Organization: Publisher -- Burning Eagle Book Company
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.0 i486)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
CC: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu,
        chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Commercial, Non-Hacker CD Distribution - A thought
References: <Pine.NEB.3.96.970419180845.4592T-100000@thelab.hub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Does this mean that Linux running under a FreeBSD emulation on Linux
would be faster than native Linux?

-Mike

The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 19 Apr 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> > >     So, StarOffice for Linux running under Linux would most likely be
> > > 'faster' then being emulated under FreeBSD
> >
> > You may well be surprised, my friend. ;-)
> 
>         FreeBSD:  A faster Linux then Linux
> 
> Marc G. Fournier
>