From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 24 20:48:02 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 407841065673;
	Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:48:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 05:48:01 +0900
From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>
Message-Id: <20100725054801.ffb36259.nork@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4C4AF046.40507@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4C4AF046.40507@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:22:02 +0000
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Intel TurboBoost in practice
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:48:03 -0000

Hi mav.

On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:53:10 +0300
Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> wrote:
> PS: In this case benefit is small, but it is the least that can be
> achieved, depending on CPU model. Some models allow frequency to be
> risen by up to 6 steps (+798MHz).

	I tested on Core i7 640UM (Arrandale 1.2GHz -> 2.26GHz) with
	openssl speed (w/o aesni(4)) and
	/usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest.c (w/ aesni(4)).

	http://people.freebsd.org/~nork/aesni/aes128cbc-noaesni.pdf [1]
	http://people.freebsd.org/~nork/aesni/aes128cbc-aesni.pdf [2]

[1] $ /usr/bin/cpuset -l$i /usr/bin/openssl speed -elapsed -mr -multi $n aes128-cbc
 $i = 0 1 2 3 0,1 0,2 0,3 1,2 1,3 2,3 0,1,2 0,1,3 0,2,3 1,2,3 0,1,2,3
 $n = numbers of core, $((`echo $i | wc -c`/2))

[2] $ /usr/bin/cpuset -l$i ./cryptotest -t $n -z 50000 8192
 $i = 0 1 2 3 0,1 0,2 0,3 1,2 1,3 2,3 0,1,2 0,1,3 0,2,3 1,2,3 0,1,2,3
 $n = numbers of core, $((`echo $i | wc -c`/2))

	In my environment, according to aes128cbc-noaesni.pdf, at least,
	30% performace up by Turbo Boost (I think).

	And according to aes128cbc-aesni.pdf, at least, 100% performance
	up by Turbo Boost (I think).

	And I understand reducing single thread performance by Hyper
	Threading:-).

-- 
Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>