From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 3 20:53:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDC4106566B for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 20:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F688FC12 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 20:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id E940156205; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 15:53:02 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 15:53:02 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20110703205302.GA22963@lonesome.com> References: <4E10BB64.9010904@missouri.edu> <20110703193906.GA4329@magic.hamla.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110703193906.GA4329@magic.hamla.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Re: Opinions sought on location of bsd.octave.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 20:53:03 -0000 On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:39:06PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > As you note above, Mk scripts exist in various locations, so there > appears to be no consensus. However, I personally agree with the > sentiment in the (somewhat dated) Wiki: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsToDo#head-3834d3f3c000f64175eaac2e490a8e76f6a5a244 fwiw, these ideas were most alepulver's. Speaking just for myself, I didn't agree with most of them. Personally I'd rather see them all in Mk/; my view is that it saves a lot of hunting around. mcl