Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:58:42 +0100 (BST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Niclas Zeising <niclas.zeising@gmail.com>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist BSD.usr.dist src/include Makefile src/lib Makefile src/rescue/rescue Makefile src/sbin/atm Makefile src/share/examples Makefile src/sys/conf NOTES files options src/sys/modules Makefile ...
Message-ID:  <20070715115727.F67691@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <4699E77F.4070509@gmail.com>
References:  <200707142149.l6ELnOfm059277@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070715103646.I37333@woozle.rinet.ru> <4699E77F.4070509@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Niclas Zeising wrote:

> RW>   Disconnect netatm from the build as it is not MPSAFE and relies on
>> RW>   NET_NEEDS_GIANT, which will shortly be removed.  This is done in a
>> RW>   away that it may be easily reattached to the build before 7.1 if
>> RW>   appropriate locking is added.  Specifics:
>> RW>   RW>   - Don't install netatm include files
>> RW>   - Disconnect netatm command line management tools
>> RW>   - Don't build libatm
>> RW>   - Don't include ATM parts in rescue or sysinstall
>> RW>   - Don't install sample configuration files and documents
>> RW>   - Don't build kernel support as a module or in NOTES
>> RW>   - Don't build netgraph wrapper nodes for netatm
>> RW>   RW>   This removes the last remaining consumer of NET_NEEDS_GIANT.
>> 
>> Hmm, shouldn't these installation removals be also reflected in 
>> ObsoleteFiles?
>
> And src.conf(5)?

I don't believe the ATM-related options in src.conf(5) (and other spots) are 
specific to netatm -- the same ifdefs/ifs/etc are used for netnatm and the 
netgraph parts also.  If you know of any additional netatm-specific parts that 
are still being installed, please let me know.  Right now the only thing I'm 
aware of that hasn't been removed is that there are some netatm-related rc.d 
bits, which I need to investigate further.

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070715115727.F67691>