Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Feb 1998 10:02:47 +1030
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Subject:   Re: Remote gdb ?
Message-ID:  <19980207100247.60298@freebie.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <199802061806.KAA10114@rah.star-gate.com>; from Amancio Hasty on Fri, Feb 06, 1998 at 10:06:31AM -0800
References:  <19980206155859.02035@freebie.lemis.com> <199802061806.KAA10114@rah.star-gate.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri,  6 February 1998 at 10:06:31 -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>> On Thu,  5 February 1998 at 20:26:13 -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>>>
>>> Does anyone know what can cause "Reply contains invalid hex digit 116" ?
>>
>> At a guess, it's an overrun.  I haven't been able to get remote gdb to
>> work reliably above 9600 bps.  In fact, I haven't been able to get it
>> to work reliably at all, but at least at 9600 bps I don't have any
>> transmission errors :-)
>>
>> Of course, I don't believe it's a hex digit at all.  I'd guess it's
>> decimal (0x74 hex, or 't').  Is it repeatable?  From what you show
>> below, it appears to be intermittent.
>
> Nope, gdb remote is broken on -current.

Where do you get that idea from?  It has numerous problems, but it
definitely works.  I've been using it for the last several weeks.

Greg



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980207100247.60298>