From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 23 16:01:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 248D716A4D0; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:01:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ip192.186.dsl-acs2.seawa0.iinet.com
	[209.20.186.192])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 821C843D46; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:01:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from randy@psg.com)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ran.psg.com.psg.com)
	by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1CLOKS-000IJt-RJ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:01:16 -0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16762.32844.243298.206348@ran.psg.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:01:16 -0700
To: Peter Lei <peter.lei@ieee.org>
References: <4177C8AD.6060706@freebsd.org>
	<4177E25E.804639E@freebsd.org>
	<x7r7nrgsol.wl%suz@crl.hitachi.co.jp>
	<4179ACB8.4020108@ieee.org>
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing itwithsomething
 simpler
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:01:18 -0000

dunno if i am the randy you meant to invoke, but sctp is far
more usable and used than t/tcp.  but it is not widely used
yet.  it very well may be.  i think it would be good to
support it, and i have zero qualms about dumping t/tcp.

randy