Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:33:09 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Subject: Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default Message-ID: <66539.1322526789@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:07:10 PST." <4ED4222E.5010707@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <4ED4222E.5010707@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes: >On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote: >> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by >> default? > >Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new >system for at least a decade. > >Ideally we could do this for 9.0. Can we at least keep one (small) library compiled for profiling, so that compiling for profiling doesn't get broken by accident ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?66539.1322526789>