Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 04 Dec 1999 11:20:49 -0500
From:      Dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
To:        Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) 
Message-ID:  <Version.32.19991122105556.02b0a4f0@etinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911211948060.81323-100000@jade.chc-chimes.c om>
References:  <199911220127.UAA28430@etinc.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 07:49 PM 11/21/99 -0500, you wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Dennis wrote:
>
>> The nightmare of instability of  3.x continues whilst the braintrust flogs
>> away at 4.x. Its really  a damn shame. And why is 3.x so much slower than
>> 2.2.8?  Will 4.0 be slower yet?
>
>Your vagueness and lack of evidence is astounding. 


The "evidence" is that 3.x chokes in conditions that 2.2.8 and LINUX dont
on the exact same hardware. Sorry I dont have time to present a case to
you.  The number of customer i have that still run 2.2.8 is perhaps
"circumstantial" evidence, but significant.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Version.32.19991122105556.02b0a4f0>