Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:49 -0800 From: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Mike Tancsa" <mike@sentex.net> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: m_tag committed Message-ID: <12a301c2c32b$08196fd0$52557f42@errno.com> References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030123164850.07c4cb58@marble.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hi,
> Will the behaviour of the FAST_IPSEC code be any different with
> how the current IPSEC interacts with ipfw/ipfw2 and ipfilter ?
>
It should not be, but I would not be surprised if there were some issues.
So far as I can tell the code has gotten little exposure in -current so I
expect there to be some bumps.
FWIW the FAST_IPSEC code has been in production use on a small number
of -stable machines for >9 months (it was originally developed on -stable).
It's been pounded on extensively and I believe is ready for use with IPv4
(there's no working IPv6 support just yet).
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12a301c2c32b$08196fd0$52557f42>