Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 00:36:45 -0800 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, dima@FreeBSD.ORG (Dima Ruban), ache@astral.msk.su, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org? Message-ID: <199602100836.AAA02287@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 10 Feb 1996 09:45:34 %2B0200." <199602100745.JAA28000@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This isn't a K4/eBones conflict issue, but if you want to do this, you damn well should get our kerberos up to K4/pl10 before doing this. I found a bunch o bugs when I did this previously and finally gave up in frustration. Once you get it up to K4pl10, diff k4pl10 against the cygnus code and bring in their bug fixes. Rather than do this, I realized that Kerberos 4 is dead and deleted it from my system and moved to ssh. ssh makes much more sense in a multi- realm environment. Kerberos is great for working inside an organization. Paul From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org? > I'm not sure what the exact interoperability status is. To date I've > just usered our version to access machines that are running our > version. I've heard conflicting things about eBones vs KerberosIV. Such as? M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grondar.za for PGP key
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602100836.AAA02287>