Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 20:45:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Nowlin <mike@r2d2.smlab.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a perceived need for a 2.1.8 release? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970418203909.5613B-100000@r2d2.smlab.com> In-Reply-To: <17971.861382575@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Anyway, given that proviso, what do those who are still running 2.1.x > think of this? Wouldn't make a bit of difference to me... I'm running 2.1.7 as our company firewall & web server, which was upgraded from 2.1.5. (I took my 2.1.0 CD's and melted them down for entertainment. 2.1.5+ was a LOT better!) The upgrade .5->.7 went flawlessly, and I haven't had a bit of difficulty since. The occasional upgrade doesn't bother me. Side Note: I just wish I could say the same thing when I upgraded our DEC Alpha 3000 from OSF 3.0 to 3.2D..... Or from 2.0 to 3.0..... In a nutshell, those four (yes, four) evenings sucked. +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Mike Nowlin -- Part-time Genius Home: mike@argos.org | | Suburban Medical Laboratory, Inc. Work: mike@smlab.com | | (330) 929-7992 http://www.imperium.net/~argos | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/CC/E d s++: a- C+++ ULBO++++ P+> L+++ E- W(--) N+ o? K- w(---) O- M-- V-- PS+ PE+ Y- PGP+ t++ 5++ X- R* tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G e h* r++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.96.970418203909.5613B-100000>