From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 8 15:00:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87345106566C for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af.gourmet@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2A28FC12 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:00:00 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Received: from [192.168.0.51] ([96.21.103.185]) by VL-MH-MR003.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KUC0096M9NVNMB0@VL-MH-MR003.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:59:55 -0500 (EST) Message-id: <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:00:01 -0500 From: PJ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: flash alternative X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:00:01 -0000 I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers; and that it is "lighter" whatever that may mean. Anyone know anything about this? TIA PJ