Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 23:44:07 +0000 From: Bjarni Runar Einarsson <bre@netverjar.is> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: natd & identd cooperation? Message-ID: <20001018234407.A4019@klaki.net> In-Reply-To: <20001018210202.A70379@genesis.k.pl>; from Tomasz Paszkowski on Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 09:02:02PM %2B0200 References: <20001018184017.A1218@klaki.net> <20001018210202.A70379@genesis.k.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Žann 2000-10-18, 21:02:02 (+0200) skrifaši Tomasz Paszkowski: > AFAIK the better idea, will be to modify oident function to communicate > with ipnat. Take a look at ipnat source, and there is a function > responsible for current nat listings. OK, this is what I thought too, until I realized that ipnat and natd are completely different things (I said I was new to this stuff :). The natd configuration was very straightforward, and is well documented on the FreeBSD web site, but I saw nothing about ipnat. This led me to think this (natd) was the "recommended" tool for implementing NAT on FreeBSD these days, and that I should concentrate my efforts on using/supporting it. Is that not the case? (And does ipnat work well with jails?) For what it's worth, I think implementing support for either system will be relatively similar in terms of coding effort. -- Bjarni R. Einarsson PGP: 02764305, B7A3AB89 bre@netverjar.is -><- http://bre.klaki.net/ Netverjar gegn ruslpósti: http://www.netverjar.is/baratta/ruslpostur/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001018234407.A4019>