Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:42:49 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Subject: Re: Commit logs for 2014/04/11 Message-ID: <20140420104249.GC7694@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <438AB9043DFB0608A926F949@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <20140412035900.3C695121E45@apnoea.adamw.org> <EA3162FC-904F-4209-81D8-67CDADA357A2@adamw.org> <20140420092922.GA90642@FreeBSD.org> <B8427660C28547FE27FAF9F7@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20140420101807.GA7694@FreeBSD.org> <438AB9043DFB0608A926F949@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 12:28:25PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > I'd point you to its documentation[1], but you don't want to do that, the > goal is to have a *standard* way of naming sample files. I thought that the goal was to have standard way of *handling* sample files. I do not see how forcing one specific, arbitrary suffix would make things hugely better or something, but perhaps that's just me. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140420104249.GC7694>