From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 20 10:42:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A3F8CCF6; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:42:49 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: Commit logs for 2014/04/11 Message-ID: <20140420104249.GC7694@FreeBSD.org> References: <20140412035900.3C695121E45@apnoea.adamw.org> <20140420092922.GA90642@FreeBSD.org> <20140420101807.GA7694@FreeBSD.org> <438AB9043DFB0608A926F949@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <438AB9043DFB0608A926F949@atuin.in.mat.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:42:49 -0000 On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 12:28:25PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > I'd point you to its documentation[1], but you don't want to do that, the > goal is to have a *standard* way of naming sample files. I thought that the goal was to have standard way of *handling* sample files. I do not see how forcing one specific, arbitrary suffix would make things hugely better or something, but perhaps that's just me. ./danfe