Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:36:40 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: better way to build libraries.. Message-ID: <200610021436.42081.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20061002082416.GC80527@funkthat.com> References: <20061001215643.GZ80527@funkthat.com> <20061002.004511.1467008375.imp@bsdimp.com> <20061002082416.GC80527@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 02 October 2006 04:24, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Warner Losh wrote this message on Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 00:45 -0600: > > In message: <20061002014320.GA80527@funkthat.com> > > John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> writes: > > : I do make includes into the obj dir and use that.. (obviously you > > : need to review is much more closely)... > > > > I think that we're talking past each other a little, so rather than > > continue down that path, I'll wait for the patch to see what it does > > and make suggested improvements. Maybe I'll implement the glue code I > > was talking about too, but with a baby due any day now, maybe not. :-) > > The patch was in the original message... The one thing that I don't > have the make-fu to do is: a) insert the buildincs before depend (so > that the psuedo /usr/include is properly depended upon), and b) find > the correct path to tools/install.sh so install doesn't chown/grp the > files... > > Once a and b are solved, then it can be properly made part of > bsd.lib.mk... and fully evaluated upon it's merits... > > btw, my original patch is at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=722594+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2006/freebsd-current/20061001.freebsd-current The sequence ru@ mentioned using 'make includes' is already in bsd.*.mk and should be sufficient for what you need. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610021436.42081.jhb>