From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 11 02:37:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3134C106566B for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giffunip@tutopia.com) Received: from nm22-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm22-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DB508FC14 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.65] by nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Mar 2011 02:25:08 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.27] by tm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Mar 2011 02:25:08 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Mar 2011 02:25:08 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 681259.34540.bm@omp1027.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 23042 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Mar 2011 02:25:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1299810308; bh=Ze0AYOTyZ3R8uO6kOkk3mqFyeLfy67I85pr4rc8nezc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1md/vzAuApYWNl2ih6ltrJ6znnyw6DVBY6tJI3WmaDaHNdWPxUPbvkRrAtcQqXruZJ009LnwPTYstFihRoYggIrHDTvDFYJqLO8XoRB0YqjK7b0uWshXAhIxoSy3c4llhEnSiBwfhb8CJ9B0ih4PIKnishJhJvz3HK3gyAU8W2Y= Message-ID: <298963.19624.qm@web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: BPstVgwVM1l14xdxIcUg2vi3FFfE.FlPxYUmgmCP4f_CMD9 mZh30J_T9_j1KJwXKJuk6htJNkirj8X5B.FA7Q3IeHApbQbgdWqY5OE3vWgz mOuE.bFcLO9ALwOb0sOSEJT6mCcfru64qG5w4yDLq.BqSJCrqz.5LVdpV6Re 84ih1c4EwPEcMP6DkDMt2sDPKoOIRueew4WBMx4boW9mvuEMAYnyh6Ku7Enm mkxeaY.VMHp4_Mb_0eTdd5AQLk4yNEfdDp2_qYthYe7qVDcvCRfWP3xhoeet rPA1Ui8wZN9GVriKTqayaXQW5H2xk4ZNv2Mex3KSBNgw0chgo8h6svOox6PC v82I.uJQuhoM_yRVwJWQyMeYJ9B2CLbyTS7LH1.iTYdq7SNRhnFP7kwmcFMt TkXUGqlkPDeyN4g-- Received: from [190.157.140.248] by web113507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:25:08 PST X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:25:08 -0800 (PST) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:41:59 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Compiler Benchmark: gcc-base vs. gcc-ports vs. clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: giffunip@tutopia.com List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:37:49 -0000 FWIW .. I think the phoronix benchmarks got similar results. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=llvm_gcc_atom&num=1 IMHO, 10% is not a huge performance difference though. Pedro.