From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 14:16:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58964106566B for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB428FC22 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA03846B37; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:16:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2B918A03C; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:16:26 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:28:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20100217; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007270928.24959.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:16:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: Subject: Re: PERFMON isn't operational on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:16:28 -0000 On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:43:00 am pluknet wrote: > Hi. > > What is a status of "options PERFMON" on amd64? > AFAIK PERFMON opt. was inherited from i386 port and never worked. > Does it make sense to wipe out perfmon part on amd64? > > buildkernel with PERFMON on results in error: > /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c:124:29: error: machine/perfmon.h: > No such file or directory > mkdep: compile failed > *** Error code 1 > > Looking at cvs I see amd64/include/perfmon.h was never here. PERFMON in general is obsoleted by hwpmc(4) which is far more useful and featureful. It should probably just be axed. -- John Baldwin