From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 11 9: 7:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1554337B574 for ; Thu, 11 May 2000 09:07:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e4BGdIh04926; Thu, 11 May 2000 09:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:39:18 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Kevin Way Cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" , David Miller , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Server Farms? Message-ID: <20000511093918.A4889@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20000509144512.L19135@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from kway@wgate.com on Thu, May 11, 2000 at 11:51:51AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Kevin Way [000511 09:26] wrote: > >>Alfred Perlstein suggested the creation of segmented CVS lists to save > >>bandwidth and mail spool space. > >Brandon D. Valentine suggested the use of procmail. > > The trouble is that while this does reduce mail spool space, and reduces > the time it takes to read the appropriate CVS lists, it does not save > bandwidth. Alfred Perlstein's suggestion would do that quite effectively. Er, that's not what I said. I said to use procmail. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message