From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 24 05:26:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6559F106566B; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443228FC16; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p9O5QBVv059102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:26:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p9O5QBne059101; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA16044; Sun, 23 Oct 11 22:02:26 PDT Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:01:11 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: llwang@infor.org Message-Id: <4ea55387.DnwwF+hvqjtumYN4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:26:12 -0000 "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" wrote: > ... the kernel or LD should know a 32-bit binary is being run > and return proper structures, as is done in Mac OS. > > ... Do we have plans to fix this kind of problems in general? > Although wine port on FreeBSD is only supported for ARCH=i386, > could there be workarounds? Does it work if you run the 32-bit app in a 32-bit jail? If so, it might be a workaround (or, arguably, a solution).