Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 07:07:21 -0800 From: David Greenman <dg@root.com> To: "Brian J. McGovern" <mcgovern@spoon.beta.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cyclades cards (hardware question) Message-ID: <199612171507.HAA07925@root.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Dec 1996 08:38:53 EST." <199612171338.IAA24038@spoon.beta.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>while FTP'ing files across all 16 ports at the same time. Running TOP, >the "interrupt" CPU time can approach as high as 24% on a 586/133. The overruns >seem to sync. up with the drive writes from the FTP sessions. > >Now, my thoughts are to switch to PCI cards with less density - 2 16 port PCI >cards), or possibly 4 8 port cards (PCI) to alleviate the problem. However, >I don't want to drive the cost up by requiring mode interface cards if its >not going to help the real problem - which may just be that I shouldn't be >hitting the hard disk while streaming these cards. At the same time, I'm >thinking if these cards are doing DMA to offload their data, the PCI Bus >will help immensely. However, I worry that if I then double my port capacity >to 32 per PC, I don't want to take what I've gained and lose a lot more. The PCI cards use shared memory just like the ISA cards...no DMA. If the cards are configured to map the memory >1MB, then the shared memory speed may be as much as 3 times that of the ISA equivilent. Cyclades has been shipping the PCI cards to map the shared memory in the 640K-1MB region, so if you do get the PCI card, make sure you change the setting via the "cytest.exe" program that Cyclades has on their FTP site. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612171507.HAA07925>