From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 15:23:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D21916A4CE; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:23:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.88.12.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C8043D45; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:23:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.droso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916DC2284E; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:23:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CB9F22282C; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:23:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:23:47 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing To: ports@FreeBSD.org, girgen@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050131152347.GL34218@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: ports@FreeBSD.org, girgen@FreeBSD.org References: <8DCD7B0AFCB0682F6A0A6E4F@rambutan.pingpong.net> <20050131123211.GK34218@droso.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xA/XKXTdy9G3iaIz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050131123211.GK34218@droso.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 0.1 Subject: Re: INDEX breakage X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:23:56 -0000 --xA/XKXTdy9G3iaIz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:32:12PM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:27:16PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > I honestly don't believe this. Did you really upgrade everything? Seems= =20 > > like you have an old Mk/bsd.ports.mk? > >=20 > The ports mentioned by Mark still include direct references to the > postgresql-ports instead of using USE_PGSQL. Luckily, they use ports > that still exist while the two I fixed used older ports. INDEX now > builds fine, but I still think those ports need to be fixed. >=20 And while you're at it, you might want to fix the breakage you caused wrt modules and category Makefiles: Missing entries in CVSROOT-port/modules: ports/databases/postgresql80-client ports/databases/postgresql80-server Orphaned entries in CVSROOT-port/modules: Orphaned entry: postgresql72 ports/databases/postgresql72 -erwin --=20 _._ _,-'""`-._ Erwin Lansing (,-.`._,'( |\`-/| erwin@lansing.dk http://droso.org `-.-' \ )-`( , o o) erwin@FreeBSD.org -bf- `- \`_`"'- --xA/XKXTdy9G3iaIz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB/k2Dqy9aWxUlaZARAm6sAKCWg9cveR9j9R1/OAklB2HxLNv0fgCguUdT wq1T2xKAJOnHZJTfBXqerZg= =QtFu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xA/XKXTdy9G3iaIz--