From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 29 15:01:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADBB1065860 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5ED8FC1C for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.11]) by QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 9p5F1c00B0EPchoA7r1a5q; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:01:34 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by OMTA01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 9r1Y1c00J1f6R9u8Mr1ZW8; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:01:34 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:01:31 -0700 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:01:31 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090629150131.GF15815@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6ae50c2d0906281009n24381ad3j59125e237739ca2c@mail.gmail.com> <6ae50c2d0906281340p68b5f8ewa41095e694cf5ff8@mail.gmail.com> <20090629003005.GE15815@comcast.net> <6ae50c2d0906282108nc34322m4d0563b2f1ad8c1b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6ae50c2d0906282108nc34322m4d0563b2f1ad8c1b@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: libtool shared X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:01:34 -0000 On Sun 28 Jun 2009 at 21:08:49 PDT alexus wrote: >I didn't had any issues while doing exact same thing on another box, >so, it's this particular box that wont compile it properly is there any >suggestions towards solution for this particular problem (other then >changing managment) =) That's new and important information! What's different about this box that makes the difference? You're using the exact same sourcecode, correct? And the exact same toolchain? What environment variables are set on the failing machine?