From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct  2 20:59:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA2F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  2 Oct 2004 20:59:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6582C43D2F
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  2 Oct 2004 20:59:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 18D2C53A37; Sat,  2 Oct 2004 14:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:00:24 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Sascha Schumann <sascha@schumann.cx>
Message-ID: <20041002210024.GA55807@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0410022154210.1355@localhost>
	<20041002200901.GA53162@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.60.0410022223070.1355@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0410022223070.1355@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: Conclusion of thread "Deadlocks with recent SMP current"?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 20:59:44 -0000


--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:49:52PM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> >Yes, this is believed to have been resolved in 5.3.
>=20
>     Good to hear.
>=20
> >So, you're running 5.2 on those systems, which was documented as a
> >development release and not recommended for use on production systems
>=20
>     No, *I* am not running FreeBSD 5 anywhere on productive
>     systems.  Unfortunaly, the ISP recommended it to this
>     particular owner of two systems where I am doing some
>     voluntary work in my spare time.
>=20
>     One of the servers ran 5.1 with an uptime of >200 days.
>     There were no indications that 5.2 contained such vast
>     regressions in comparison to 5.1.  Even today, the 5.2.1
>     errata page does not say anything about SMP issues.

Er, well, that doesn't mean anything other than no-one updated the
errata page.

Kris
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBXxboWry0BWjoQKURAgFFAKDnR1nYmn6SND1vtoJUNOEcyQrA3ACgmIK7
ecPC6l84FzKRcWmG5DCNdpM=
=icDM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--