From owner-freebsd-chat  Sat Apr 19 19:10:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA28204
          for chat-outgoing; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 19:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (hal-ns1-27.netcom.ca [207.181.94.91])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA28169
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 19:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thelab.hub.org (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id XAA01249; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 23:08:59 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 23:08:59 -0300 (ADT)
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: mike allison <mallison@konnections.com>
cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu,
        chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Commercial, Non-Hacker CD Distribution - A thought
In-Reply-To: <335AD053.5CEE766@konnections.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96.970419230841.852D-100000@thelab.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 20 Apr 1997, mike allison wrote:

> Does this mean that Linux running under a FreeBSD emulation on Linux
> would be faster than native Linux?

	It was joke...but, hey, if the shoe fits... :)

> 
> -Mike
> 
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, 19 Apr 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > 
> > > >     So, StarOffice for Linux running under Linux would most likely be
> > > > 'faster' then being emulated under FreeBSD
> > >
> > > You may well be surprised, my friend. ;-)
> > 
> >         FreeBSD:  A faster Linux then Linux
> > 
> > Marc G. Fournier
> >
> 

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org