Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:13:58 -0500 (EST) From: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another milestone... Message-ID: <20040222091238.A5512@xeon.unixathome.org> In-Reply-To: <20040222090442.GA73246@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20031229223455.GA41141@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <40158A17.2878.2FDF2E3@localhost> <20040222090442.GA73246@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:43:51PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > On 29 Dec 2003 at 22:34, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > > According to freshports.org, the addition of the palm/uppc-kmod port on > > > Mon Dec 29 16:33:02 2003 UTC has resulted in the passing of yet another > > > milestone: this took the count of available ports to 10,000. > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/palm/uppc-kmod/Makefile > > > > > > Pretty impressive going. > > > > Not to detract from the significance, But I should be the first to > > say that FreshPorts counts ports differently to that found in > > /usr/ports/INDEX, which does not necessarily include all ports in the > > tree. > > By definition, INDEX includes all ports that are connected to the > tree, and excludes only those that have not yet been connected > (e.g. repo-copies in progress) or have been deliberately disconnected > (usually due to extreme breakage). > > AFAIR freshports counts the disconnected ports too. Yes, FreshPorts does count them. It is literally a "select count(*) from ports where status <> 'D'". -- Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040222091238.A5512>