From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 29 12:08:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4171065673 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 12:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdports@chillibear.com) Received: from mail.sundive.org (mail.sundive.org [212.13.197.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37BF8FC17 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 12:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.113.224.41] (helo=[192.168.0.44]) by sundive.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1OIKe0-000NtF-Oa; Sat, 29 May 2010 12:56:02 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 12:50:06 +0100 From: Eric To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: ports/147183: New port: devel/rubygem-sax-machine (ruby HTML/XML manipulation library) Thread-Index: Acr/JRS48eq2Uf1qTUqJVHSh2Z6o5Q== In-Reply-To: <201005291140.o4TBe8Gh005089@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 87.113.224.41 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: freebsdports@chillibear.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on sun.sundive.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_05 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on sundive.org) X-bounce-key: sundive.org-1;freebsdports@chillibear.com;1275135246;a55d0511; Cc: Eric Subject: Re: ports/147183: New port: devel/rubygem-sax-machine (ruby HTML/XML manipulation library) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 12:08:23 -0000 Whoops, just notice my copy and paste error. This port is intended for the textproc category not the devel category. The subject should have been textproc/rubygem-sax-machine The SHAR is however correct.