From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 23 19:28:23 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id TAA23630 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 19:28:23 -0800 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA23623 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 19:28:19 -0800 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA29741; Thu, 23 Feb 95 20:21:26 MST From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9502240321.AA29741@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: majordomo & perl To: xiao@bnr.ca (bo) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 95 20:21:25 MST Cc: jmb@kryten.atinc.com, tsbarry@bnr.ca, frank@jplpio.jpl.nasa.gov, questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <"1993 Thu Feb 23 20:41:42 1995"@bnr.ca> from "bo" at Feb 23, 95 08:41:00 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Majordomo 1.93 will NOT work with the stocked 2.0R > or SNAPs because of the older perl. Grab the new > perl5.000 and all will be fine. I have to put domaen > in group majordom to make it work. A couple scripts > look for sendmail in wrong places but easy to find > by the testing. So someone enter into an NDA and put a binary driver up for FTP already! Sheesh! NDA's are only a problem if your kernel is GPL'ed and you give it away so that it's not OK to give them away with binary only pieces. I suggest that it be a loaded module however, since binary-only ought not to be included in the distribution kernels. Besides, it doesn't make any sense to distribute a driver for a rare piece of hardware in your default kernel. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.