From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 24 11:18:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from artsmail.uwaterloo.ca (artsmail.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.42.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FC714DD6 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:18:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cmccolm@artsmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from artsu221.uwaterloo.ca (cmccolm@artsu221.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.42.48]) by artsmail.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3/8.9.2) with SMTP id OAA95017 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 14:18:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cmccolm@artsmail.uwaterloo.ca) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20000124141834.007d2c50@artsmail.uwaterloo.ca> X-Sender: cmccolm@artsmail.uwaterloo.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 14:18:34 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Charles McColm Subject: Re: FREE CASH, NO CATCH......... In-Reply-To: <20000124114729.N35015@enteract.com> References: <388C8BD1.D650765C@nwlink.com> <00256870.0031F291.00@rslhub.raytheon.co.uk> <388C8BD1.D650765C@nwlink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:47 AM 1/24/00 -0600, you wrote: >They definitely do have a spam polity, and that twit definitely violated it. >I emailed abuse@alladvantage.com about his post, so hopefully he's already >lost his account. You know what they say about one bad apple... >> > Do they actually have a spam policy then? >> Not likely. I should never have replied. Here I go again... This ticks me off though, because now my email address has been harvested by these jerks. It angers me that my address has been made public because of this list. Charles McColm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message