From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 05:57:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEE916A417 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF45013C4D1 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:57:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so1561228rvb.43 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:57:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=8TPVCVbsN//pn831/QkyXi+KrDWF7+HeSSONzDoytpQ=; b=va6/ZLFNzzt84vuH24jdbUbTbNdrr04KSsR19lf5A7/R4R9NB/ysJ0mEJXoO8e/7OI9odLclfUSof56hW+gEiKqCpRyjO1bOAEWq3oKcBY8xBWZRtiJByscKHWob6TbiJc0F6NSu2EQ/eE+2mQm4YaJWUdMOEOY72cKcCUIzwiw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XDg9Xtp2z4Kwtj5s50fl4zM4YxZOOA0zh6JCBbKCFSs2OWW7FixYVdLQxiMG6o2qxy/QDj7OS1lRVapRwokZoEBvLqHvFlDrUYzG/IpVOoWLIOAjLyl6WDJRfRU7QnctGztEbE9oQlyF2lxJSbeygEiWiamgZ5PGKXE5e0vrMn0= Received: by 10.141.83.15 with SMTP id k15mr4461179rvl.120.1202104664381; Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:57:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.141.7 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:57:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:57:44 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Christian Baer" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a Text on ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:57:45 -0000 On 03/02/2008, Christian Baer wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:38:49 -0600 illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > Well, the best, I think. > > I take ist, you don't approve of ZFS? :-) > It is not a panacaea. The optimisation and sharing of r/w, Load balancing, And redundant data verification (to say nothing of the supposed ability to blindly stab disks into a nearly infinite array) are all features that I can see being appreciated. In a couple of processor generations. (I am talking desktop junk here) The kids running big iron will have already decided and my feeble arguments are like sand in a badger's vagina. -- --