Date: 04 Feb 2005 12:49:49 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Zlatozar Zhelyazkov <zlatozar@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD_Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: STABLE kernel update Message-ID: <44fz0cxlj6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <6fda1872050203151573deb982@mail.gmail.com> References: <6fda1872050203151573deb982@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Zlatozar Zhelyazkov <zlatozar@gmail.com> writes: > I updated my FreeBSD up-to STABLE and build kernel, but "uname -a" shows > FreeBSD-STABLE #0 > It was suspicious that there is no kernel patch releases so I checked. > Really there were! My question is - should I apply this patches or > there are included in my last update (and applied with kernel build) ? That "#0" has nothing to do with patch level; it just means that it is the first kernel you built in that directory. Assuming you correctly followed the upgrade directions, you are all set. > I have to apply patches by hand, right? Is there binary update for > STABLE systems? There is FreeBSD Update, but I don't think you need it; you are probably fully up-to-date.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44fz0cxlj6.fsf>