Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:40:25 +0500 From: "Narek Gharibyan" <ngharibyan@mail.ru> To: "'Grant Peel'" <gpeel@thenetnow.com>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: IPFW Questions. Message-ID: <000001c7e32f$ac28edc0$180ca8c0@arm.synisys.com> In-Reply-To: <037d01c7e32b$0c8d3c70$6501a8c0@GRANT> References: <037d01c7e32b$0c8d3c70$6501a8c0@GRANT>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have same problem related to ipfw pullup. I couldn't find any documentation or solution on it. Narek -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Grant Peel Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 6:07 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IPFW Questions. Hi all, I was wondering what the concensus is on using dynamic rules in IPFW. Every once in a while, I suppose there is a DoS attaclk that causes me to see hundreds of: +ipfw: install_state: Too many dynamic rules in my security log. I am sure i read somewhere that many people are skipping the dynamic rules and just relying on the line by line rules. You thoughts please. Any while your up, does anyone really know what this means? ipfw: pullup failed I dont see that often maybe 1 or 2 times a month. -Grant _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001c7e32f$ac28edc0$180ca8c0>