Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:56:58 -0600 From: "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@iteration.net> To: Devin Butterfield <dbutter@wireless.net> Cc: freebsd-small@freebsd.org, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: StrongARM support? Message-ID: <20001219125657.A94588@peorth.iteration.net> In-Reply-To: <3A3EA852.A668B554@wireless.net>; from dbutter@wireless.net on Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:14:10PM -0800 References: <78656.976769151@winston.osd.bsdi.com> <3A3862E4.5A46E14C@wireless.net> <20001218151235.D69041@peorth.iteration.net> <3A3EA852.A668B554@wireless.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:14:10PM -0800, Devin Butterfield scribbled: | "Michael C . Wu" wrote: | > The most important decision now would be: | > Should we concentrate on the PPC port first? Or should we go at each | > port simultaneously? | | Well, if there are enough people with PCC's that are interested in | helping with the effort then perhaps pursuing the PPC port first would | make more sense. I don't have a PPC so I couldn't help out there... | | If the decision is to pursue a StrongARM port then you can count me in. I'm definitely interested in both StrongARM and PPC. (and so are very many people) My understanding is that FreeBSD *wants* a FreeBSD/ARM, but lack the resources/man-power to do so. I'd prefer to see an official decision on the above by someone (hint hint -core :)) though. -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | keichii@peorth.iteration.net | keichii@bsdconspiracy.net | | http://peorth.iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. | +------------------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001219125657.A94588>