Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 13:16:53 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS within a Jail?! Message-ID: <op.wiqieft734t2sn@tech304> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK2sFU%2BjMf6f7Yir7o9JjKUK=u-p1syFONds0MV=M7nZqg@mail.gmail.com> References: <1344347348.23440.5.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <5022715C.9010301@a1poweruser.com> <CA%2BtpaK2sFU%2BjMf6f7Yir7o9JjKUK=u-p1syFONds0MV=M7nZqg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:55:51 -0500, Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are a number of people who have reached the > opposite decision concerning VIMAGE/VNET enabled jails. They are much > easier to work with and provide nice capabilities. I tried it on 9.0-RELEASE and was able to cause kernel panics quite easily, so I've avoided it. I expect things to be worked out by the end of the 9.x train and/or 10.0. They certainly do provide some nice capabilities, though.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wiqieft734t2sn>