From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug  8 18:17:03 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2BF106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  8 Aug 2012 18:17:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57588FC08
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  8 Aug 2012 18:17:02 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
	s=blargle; 
	h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type;
	bh=wAgB0dc+fMmK51XVHUV6+R5ujWFB0yJZT3q2y0rRWqo=; 
	b=BCsRvU/o1HLKXV0yzxxpwdxLqR+ytzEA1K+5xnl558acIx9v5O5l82LJCAlcyzsUZiNhccWdy/kD9AYakPTDsIOxsilOR9L7otYjuADRVN6xuOeWxO1lC62/lIaZrVhF;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
	by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <feld@feld.me>) id 1SzAoV-00043M-H5
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:17:02 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
	with esmtpa id 1344449813-41577-41576/5/45; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 18:16:53
	+0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <1344347348.23440.5.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu>
	<5022715C.9010301@a1poweruser.com>
	<CA+tpaK2sFU+jMf6f7Yir7o9JjKUK=u-p1syFONds0MV=M7nZqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 13:16:53 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Message-Id: <op.wiqieft734t2sn@tech304>
In-Reply-To: <CA+tpaK2sFU+jMf6f7Yir7o9JjKUK=u-p1syFONds0MV=M7nZqg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (FreeBSD)
X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5, PLING_QUERY=0.279
X-SA-Score: -1.2
Subject: Re: NFS within a Jail?!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:17:03 -0000

On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:55:51 -0500, Adam Vande More  
<amvandemore@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> There are a number of people who have reached the
> opposite decision concerning VIMAGE/VNET enabled jails.  They are much
> easier to work with and provide nice capabilities.

I tried it on 9.0-RELEASE and was able to cause kernel panics quite  
easily, so I've avoided it. I expect things to be worked out by the end of  
the 9.x train and/or 10.0. They certainly do provide some nice  
capabilities, though.