From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 03:08:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA73916A4D5 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:08:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-2.mdc.net (smtp-2.mdc.net [209.251.64.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE7E43D2D for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:08:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matthew@netway.com) Received: from admin1.mdc.net (admin1.mdc.net [209.251.64.23]) by smtp-2.mdc.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA01160; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:08:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matthew@netway.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:08:18 -0500 (EST) From: matthew X-X-Sender: matthew@admin1.mdc.net To: Spades In-Reply-To: <009301c3f47c$8322bdc0$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> Message-ID: <20040216060707.M1531@admin1.mdc.net> References: <030201c3f287$ba2f61c0$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> <009301c3f47c$8322bdc0$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kent Stewart Subject: Re: 5.x stable cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:08:52 -0000 On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Spades wrote: > Thanks, but /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't exist > > spank# ls /usr/src > crypto kerberos5 secure > spank# uname -a > FreeBSD spank 5.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jun 5 02:55:42 GMT > 2003 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > To me, that looks wrong. Please show us your /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ stable-supfile... You should have a lot more in /usr/src than that. m > Hmm? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kent Stewart" > To: ; "Spades" > Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 9:46 AM > Subject: Re: 5.x stable cvsup > > > > On Friday 13 February 2004 03:18 pm, Spades wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I got a question, my dedicated server provider has installed > > > 5.1-Release and refuses to install 4.7 for me. Can I recompile to > > > 5.1-STABLE using the same method as 4.7 and same 4.x-stable-supfile > > > and kernel config file. > > > > The accepted technique is in /usr/src/UPDATING just like it is in 4.x. > > There are a few things different but the buildworld, > > build[install]kernel, installworld method is used on both branches. > > > > I think 4.7 has been EOLed, i.e., no bug fixes or security fixes. I > > wouldn't want one on my local network. > > > > > > > > OR do i need to use a 5,x-stable method? any idea any url > > > i can find help in compiling 5.1-REL to STABLE. > > > > > > > There isn't a 5.x-stable. You probably won't see that until 5.3-stable. > > > > Kent > > > > -- > > Kent Stewart > > Richland, WA > > > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >