Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:12:25 -0500
From:      PJ <af.gourmet@videotron.ca>
To:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: flash alternative
Message-ID:  <4B1E6CD9.30402@videotron.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca>
References:  <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
PJ wrote:
> I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently
> more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers; and that
> it is "lighter" whatever that may mean.
> Anyone know anything about this?
> TIA
> PJ
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org
>   
Could F3 be the alternative/replacement?
http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/f3:_a_replacement_for_flash%3F
http://blogs.sun.com/chrisoliver/

I'd like to hear some opinions on this.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B1E6CD9.30402>